Logo
Logo
Log inSign up
Logo

Tools

AI Concept MapsAI Mind MapsAI Study NotesAI FlashcardsAI Quizzes

Resources

BlogTemplate

Info

PricingFAQTeam

info@algoreducation.com

Corso Castelfidardo 30A, Torino (TO), Italy

Algor Lab S.r.l. - Startup Innovativa - P.IVA IT12537010014

Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyTerms and Conditions

The Fiedler Contingency Model: Understanding Leadership Effectiveness

The Fiedler Contingency Model of Leadership, developed by Fred Fiedler, posits that effective leadership depends on the match between a leader's style and situational demands. It assesses leadership as task-oriented or relationship-oriented using the LPC scale and evaluates situational control through leader-member relations, task structure, and position power. The model's alignment of leadership style with environmental factors is key for organizational success.

See more
Open map in editor

1

5

Open map in editor

Want to create maps from your material?

Insert your material in few seconds you will have your Algor Card with maps, summaries, flashcards and quizzes.

Try Algor

Learn with Algor Education flashcards

Click on each Card to learn more about the topic

1

According to the model, leadership styles are classified as either ______-oriented or ______-oriented, with effectiveness determined by leader-member relations, task structure, and the leader's ______ power.

Click to check the answer

task relationship position

2

Fiedler's Model Key Aspect

Click to check the answer

Leadership effectiveness tied to situational context and leader's style.

3

Hersey and Blanchard's Theory Focus

Click to check the answer

Leadership adapts to followers' maturity and competence levels.

4

House's Path-Goal Theory Core Idea

Click to check the answer

Leader's behavior should complement subordinates' abilities and work environment.

5

The ______ Contingency Model uses the LPC scale to determine if a leader is more relationship-oriented or task-oriented.

Click to check the answer

Fiedler

6

A high score on the LPC scale suggests a leader prioritizes ______, whereas a low score points to a focus on ______.

Click to check the answer

relationships tasks

7

Leader-Member Relations Impact

Click to check the answer

Indicates trust, confidence in leader; foundational for influence.

8

Task Structure Importance

Click to check the answer

Defines clarity of roles, procedures; high structure aids leader effectiveness.

9

Leader's Position Power

Click to check the answer

Reflects formal authority, ability to reward/punish; strengthens leader's control.

10

The ______ Contingency Model emphasizes matching a leader's style with the level of situational control for better leadership.

Click to check the answer

Fiedler

11

Six power bases in French and Raven's framework

Click to check the answer

Reward, coercive, legitimate, referent, expert, informational.

12

Influence exertion methods for leaders

Click to check the answer

Formal authority, personal attributes, control over info and resources.

13

This model is beneficial for organizational development and ______ training, as it helps choose the right leadership style for various ______.

Click to check the answer

leadership scenarios

14

Fiedler Contingency Model Core Principle

Click to check the answer

Leadership effectiveness determined by leadership style and situational control.

15

LPC Scale in Fiedler's Model

Click to check the answer

Tool to measure leader's task vs. relationship orientation; criticized for potential biases.

16

Situational Context Relevance in Fiedler's Model

Click to check the answer

Model asserts situational context is crucial for leadership success; different settings require different styles.

Q&A

Here's a list of frequently asked questions on this topic

Similar Contents

Psychology

Behavioral Theory in Business Studies

View document

Psychology

Communication Barriers

View document

Psychology

Cultural Barriers in Communication

View document

Psychology

Charismatic Leadership

View document

Exploring the Fiedler Contingency Model of Leadership

The Fiedler Contingency Model, formulated by psychologist Fred Fiedler in 1967, asserts that there is no one best way to lead. Instead, leadership effectiveness hinges on the interplay between a leader's inherent style and the control afforded by the situation. The model categorizes leadership styles as either task-oriented or relationship-oriented and evaluates the situation based on three contextual variables: leader-member relations, task structure, and the leader's position power.
Diverse team in a boardroom meeting with a South Asian woman leading the discussion, city skyline visible through the window, sunny day outside.

The Core Principles of Contingency Theory in Leadership

Contingency theory in leadership, exemplified by Fiedler's model, recognizes that leadership must be adaptable to the context in which it is exercised. It is one of the principal theories that shaped the understanding of leadership adaptability, alongside other notable models such as Hersey and Blanchard's Situational Leadership Theory, House's Path-Goal Theory, and Vroom and Yetton's Normative Decision Model. These theories collectively underscore the significance of environmental and situational variables in determining the most suitable leadership approach.

Determining Leadership Style with the LPC Scale

The Fiedler Contingency Model employs the Least Preferred Coworker (LPC) scale to identify a leader's primary style. Leaders evaluate the coworker with whom they least prefer to work using a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., friendly/unfriendly, supportive/unsupportive). The resulting score reveals the leader's orientation; a high LPC score suggests a relationship-oriented leader, while a low score indicates a task-oriented leader. This assessment is vital as it influences the leader's behavior and strategies in managing their team.

Evaluating Situational Control Factors

The model requires leaders to appraise the situational control by examining three critical factors: the quality of leader-member relations, the degree of task structure, and the extent of the leader's position power. These factors collectively determine the leader's influence and authority within the organization. Good leader-member relations indicate trust and confidence in the leader, a high task structure denotes clear roles and procedures, and strong position power reflects the leader's formal authority and ability to reward or punish.

Aligning Leadership Style with Situational Demands

The essence of the Fiedler Contingency Model is to align the leader's style with the situational control factors to enhance leadership effectiveness. Task-oriented leaders are posited to perform best in situations that are either highly controlled or extremely lax, where the leader's influence is clear-cut. Conversely, relationship-oriented leaders tend to thrive in situations of moderate control, where interpersonal skills can bridge gaps in structure or authority. This alignment is crucial for organizations to ensure that leadership styles are conducive to the current environment.

Delving into Position Power with French and Raven's Bases of Power

To comprehend the nuances of a leader's position power, one can reference French and Raven's framework of social power, which delineates six power bases: reward, coercive, legitimate, referent, expert, and informational. This framework aids in understanding the various ways leaders can exert influence, whether through formal authority, personal attributes, or control over information and resources.

Implementing the Fiedler Contingency Model in Organizational Contexts

The Fiedler Contingency Model serves as a practical tool for organizations to evaluate and refine their leadership dynamics. By considering specific scenarios, such as a team with weak leader-member relations or a change in leadership, the model guides the selection of a leadership style that is most apt for the situation at hand. Its adaptability renders it a valuable asset for organizational development and leadership training programs.

Weighing the Pros and Cons of the Fiedler Contingency Model

The Fiedler Contingency Model offers a nuanced perspective on leadership by emphasizing the importance of situational context. Its strengths lie in its systematic approach and its broad applicability to different organizational settings. However, it is not without its criticisms, which include potential biases inherent in the LPC scale and the somewhat rigid dichotomy between task and relationship orientations. Despite these critiques, the model's focus on the interplay between leadership style and situational control continues to be a cornerstone in the study of leadership effectiveness.