Interactionism and Crime
Concept Map
The interactionist perspective on crime and deviance examines how societal interactions contribute to the definitions of these behaviors. It delves into symbolic interactionism, labelling theory, and the effects of societal reactions on individuals. The text discusses the role of power dynamics in the labelling process and strategies for addressing deviance, such as reintegrative shaming and the amplification of deviancy.
Summary
Outline
Interactionism's Perspective on Crime and Deviance
Interactionism is a sociological perspective that focuses on the dynamic interactions between individuals and the society in which they live. It suggests that social order is constructed through these interactions, with individuals continuously interpreting and defining their actions and the actions of others. This perspective is particularly relevant to the study of crime and deviance, as it posits that these concepts are not inherent to certain behaviors but are instead the result of social processes that label certain actions as unacceptable. Through interactionism, we understand that definitions of crime and deviance are not static but are subject to change based on societal interactions and interpretations.Symbolic Interactionism's Role in Defining Crime
Symbolic interactionism, a branch of interactionism, examines how individuals create and interpret the symbolic meanings of their social world. Developed by Herbert Blumer, this approach asserts that people act based on the meanings they ascribe to things, and these meanings are derived from social interaction. In the context of crime, symbolic interactionism suggests that criminal behavior is not inherently wrong but becomes criminal when society collectively decides to define it as such. This perspective highlights the importance of societal reaction in the construction of crime, as acts are criminalized through the process of social definition and agreement.The Influence of Labelling Theory on Deviance
Labelling theory, a core idea within interactionism, was developed by sociologists such as Howard Becker and focuses on the societal reaction to deviance. It argues that deviance is not a quality of the act itself but a consequence of the application of rules and sanctions to an "offender." The theory emphasizes the role of social control agencies in creating deviance by labelling certain behaviors and individuals as deviant. This labelling can have profound effects, potentially leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy where the labelled individual may increasingly identify with the deviant role, especially if societal reactions limit their opportunities for non-deviant behavior.Differential Impact of Social Labelling
Labelling theory also examines the uneven application of deviant labels across different social groups, often influenced by power dynamics. Studies have indicated that certain groups, such as ethnic minorities and the economically disadvantaged, are more likely to be labelled as deviant and face legal repercussions. Aaron Cicourel's research on the decision-making processes of law enforcement and judicial systems demonstrated that stereotypes about the "typical delinquent" can influence who gets labelled as deviant. Edwin Lemert distinguished between primary deviance, which refers to initial rule-breaking behavior that may go unnoticed, and secondary deviance, which is a response to societal labelling and has significant implications for an individual's identity and community standing.Strategies for Addressing Deviance: Reintegrative Shaming and Amplification
John Braithwaite's concept of reintegrative shaming is a response to the negative effects of labelling, proposing a method of addressing deviance that emphasizes healing and reintegration rather than stigmatization. This approach aims to prevent future deviance by maintaining the offender's bond to the community. Conversely, Stanley Cohen's deviancy amplification theory explores how media and public reaction can intensify societal responses to deviance, potentially leading to an escalation of deviant behavior. Cohen's analysis of the "mods and rockers" conflicts in the UK during the 1960s exemplifies how media portrayal can contribute to moral panics and result in more severe societal crackdowns on perceived deviance.Interactionism Versus Functionalism in Explaining Crime
Interactionism's approach to crime can be contrasted with functionalism, which interprets crime as a natural outgrowth of societal dysfunctions and an inevitable part of social life. Functionalists argue that crime serves certain functions, such as reinforcing norms and promoting social change. Interactionists, however, focus on the social construction of crime through labelling and the consequences of this process. They challenge the notion that crime is a simple failure to conform to societal norms, instead highlighting the subjective nature of deviance and the role of power in criminalization.Assessing Interactionist Contributions to Understanding Crime
The interactionist perspective on crime provides valuable insights into the social processes that define and perpetuate deviance. It underscores the significance of labelling in the experience of deviance, the marginalization of certain groups, and the variable nature of deviance. Nonetheless, the theory has its limitations, including a tendency to overlook the initial reasons for deviant acts and the origins of societal norms. Critics also point out that interactionism may overemphasize the deterministic power of labels and neglect the agency of individuals who resist or reject these labels. Despite these critiques, interactionism remains an influential and useful framework for examining the complex relationship between individual behavior and societal responses to crime and deviance.
Show More
Interactionism
Dynamic Interactions
Interactionism focuses on the dynamic interactions between individuals and society
Social Order
Construction through Interactions
Social order is constructed through the continuous interpretation and definition of actions by individuals and society
Changeability
Social order is subject to change based on societal interactions and interpretations
Crime and Deviance
Interactionism suggests that crime and deviance are not inherent to certain behaviors but are the result of social processes and definitions
Symbolic Interactionism
Creation and Interpretation of Symbolic Meanings
Symbolic interactionism examines how individuals create and interpret the symbolic meanings of their social world
Social Construction of Crime
Symbolic interactionism suggests that criminal behavior is not inherently wrong but becomes criminal through societal definitions
Societal Reaction
Symbolic interactionism highlights the importance of societal reaction in the construction of crime
Labelling Theory
Societal Reaction to Deviance
Labelling theory focuses on the societal reaction to deviance and argues that deviance is not a quality of the act itself
Role of Social Control Agencies
Labelling theory emphasizes the role of social control agencies in creating deviance through labelling
Uneven Application of Labels
Labelling theory examines how power dynamics can influence the uneven application of deviant labels across different social groups
Reintegrative Shaming and Deviancy Amplification
Reintegrative Shaming
Reintegrative shaming proposes a method of addressing deviance that emphasizes healing and reintegration rather than stigmatization
Deviancy Amplification
Deviancy amplification theory explores how media and public reaction can intensify societal responses to deviance
Critiques and Limitations
Interactionism has its limitations, including a tendency to overlook the initial reasons for deviant acts and the origins of societal norms
Interactionism and Crime
Learn with Algor Education flashcards
Click on each Card to learn more about the topic
00
______ is a sociological view that emphasizes the ongoing exchanges between people and their ______.
Interactionism
society
01
Symbolic interactionism originator
Herbert Blumer developed symbolic interactionism, focusing on symbolic meaning creation.
02
Symbolic interactionism core idea
People act based on meanings ascribed to things, which come from social interaction.
