Reliability of Eyewitness Testimony

Concept Map

Algorino

Edit available

Eyewitness identification plays a crucial role in the justice system, often determining the outcome of criminal cases. The reliability of such testimony, however, is influenced by psychological factors like stress, which can impair memory recall. Studies, including one conducted at the London Dungeon, reveal that high stress can reduce identification accuracy, with implications for wrongful convictions.

Summary

Outline

The Role of Eyewitness Identification in the Justice System

Eyewitness identification is a pivotal element in the administration of justice, where witnesses are asked to recall and identify individuals involved in criminal activities. However, the reliability of such testimony is subject to scrutiny due to the potential for error. The Innocence Project, an organization dedicated to exonerating the wrongfully convicted through DNA evidence, has found that eyewitness misidentification is a leading cause of wrongful convictions, implicated in approximately 70% of cases overturned by DNA evidence in the United States. This statistic underscores the need for caution and rigorous standards when relying on eyewitness accounts in legal proceedings.

Suspects of various ethnicities queuing for police recognition, witness looking from behind, neutral and illuminated environment.

Influences on the Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony

Eyewitness testimony can be influenced by a variety of psychological factors that may compromise its accuracy. Confirmation bias, for example, can cause a witness to remember and report information that confirms their preexisting beliefs or expectations. Questioning techniques can also affect memory; leading questions can introduce misinformation or alter a witness's original memory. Additionally, discussions with other witnesses can lead to co-witness contamination, where one witness's account influences another's. Emotional states, such as anxiety, can either hinder or enhance memory recall, with research indicating that moderate levels of stress may improve memory, while high levels can impair it.

Stress and Its Effects on Memory and Eyewitness Identification

The impact of stress on eyewitness memory is multifaceted. Extreme stress, often induced by the presence of a weapon during a crime (weapon focus effect), can narrow a witness's attention and impair their ability to recall details accurately. On the other hand, some studies have shown that stress can heighten alertness and improve memory recall, particularly in real-life situations where witnesses have provided detailed and consistent accounts over time. The Yerkes-Dodson law suggests that there is an optimal level of arousal for cognitive performance, implying that while moderate stress can enhance memory recall, excessive stress can be detrimental.

Investigating Stress and Eyewitness Identification in an Experimental Setting

The study by Valentine and Mesout (2009) conducted at the London Dungeon offers empirical evidence on the effects of stress on eyewitness identification. In this experiment, participants encountered an actor in a staged, stressful environment and were later asked to identify the actor from a lineup. The findings indicated that participants with higher self-reported anxiety and physiological indicators of stress were less accurate in their identifications. The study also found gender differences, with women reporting higher anxiety and showing lower identification accuracy, suggesting that stress levels can negatively affect the reliability of eyewitness identification.

Assessing the Validity of Eyewitness Identification Research

While the London Dungeon study provides valuable insights into the relationship between stress and eyewitness identification, it is important to consider the limitations of the research design. The use of an opportunity sample, consisting of individuals who voluntarily visited a horror attraction, may not be representative of the general population. However, the study's employment of objective physiological measures, controlled experimental conditions, and a realistic setting enhances its validity. The research highlights the necessity of acknowledging individual differences in stress responses when evaluating eyewitness testimony and emphasizes the need for the legal system to incorporate an understanding of psychological factors that can influence eyewitness accuracy.