Feedback
What do you think about us?
Your name
Your email
Message
Exploring the initial expectations of a short World War I, this content delves into the offensive military doctrines, rigid mobilization plans, and the intricate diplomacy that led to war. It examines the roles of key figures like Moltke and Kitchener, and the historical debate over war guilt, highlighting the shared responsibility among European powers and Germany's significant influence.
Show More
Many European leaders and the public believed that World War I would be short-lived, with a resolution expected by Christmas of 1914
German Generals
German Generals Helmuth von Moltke and Erich Ludendorff expressed concerns about a long and destructive war
French General
French General Joseph Joffre also anticipated the possibility of a protracted war
British Secretary of State for War
British Secretary of State for War Lord Kitchener lamented the lights going out across Europe, foreseeing a long struggle ahead
The military strategies of the early 20th century favored offensive tactics, leading to inflexible mobilization plans that hindered diplomatic negotiations
The detailed and rigid mobilization plans of the time left little room for diplomatic flexibility, contributing to the phenomenon of "war by timetable."
Russia's initial partial mobilization against Austria-Hungary quickly proved untenable, leading to a full mobilization and subsequent escalation of the conflict
Germany's interpretation of Russian mobilization as an act of war led to its own mobilization and declaration of war on Russia
The debate over which nation bears the most responsibility for the outbreak of World War I has been a contentious issue among historians
Early post-war narratives often placed the blame on Germany, but subsequent scholarship has recognized the shared culpability among the European powers
German historian Fritz Fischer's thesis led to a broader acknowledgment of Germany's significant role in the war's origins
The question of which country initiated World War I and who is to blame remains a topic of debate in historical scholarship