The Activation Synthesis Model, proposed by J. Allan Hobson and Robert McCarley, explains dreams as the brain's attempt to interpret random neural activity during REM sleep. Unlike Freud's theory, which sees dreams as symbolic of unconscious desires, this model views them as byproducts of brain function. It emphasizes the role of the brainstem and cerebral cortex in generating dreams, and has sparked debate in the scientific community.
Show More
Dreams have fascinated humans throughout history, leading to diverse interpretations and theories
Sigmund Freud's Theory
Sigmund Freud believed dreams were expressions of repressed desires and conflicts
The Activation Synthesis Model offers a neurobiological explanation for dreaming, proposing that dreams result from the brain's effort to make sense of spontaneous neural activity during REM sleep
During REM sleep, the brain is highly active, resembling its state during wakefulness, yet it is disconnected from external sensory inputs and voluntary muscular activity
REM atonia refers to the disconnection of the brain from external sensory inputs and voluntary muscular activity during REM sleep
The Activation Synthesis Model theorizes that the internal neural activity during REM sleep is largely random and originates from physiological stimuli within the brainstem
Activation refers to the surge in neural activity during REM sleep, believed to be stochastic and originating from internal physiological stimuli
Synthesis involves the cerebral cortex's interpretation of the random neural activity during REM sleep, utilizing memories and experiences to construct a dream
The Activation Synthesis Model suggests that the brain creates dreams by attempting to make sense of the random neural signals during REM sleep and weaving them into a coherent narrative using stored memories and experiences
Critics argue that the Activation Synthesis Model oversimplifies the multifaceted nature of dreaming to mere brain activity
The model's reliance on animal research and neuroimaging methods has been scrutinized for the validity and applicability of its conclusions
Some critics suggest that dream origination may be more cortex-centric than brainstem-centric, and the model fails to explain dreams that occur outside of REM sleep