Obedience to Authority: From Milgram to Modern Times
Exploring the dynamics of obedience, this content delves into Stanley Milgram's 1960s experiments that revealed a strong human tendency to follow authority. Ethical reflections on such studies have since shaped psychological research guidelines. Modern studies by Bocchiaro et al. and Jerry Burger have continued this investigation, focusing on obedience, disobedience, and the role of individual traits, all within ethical frameworks.
See more1
5
Exploring the Dynamics of Obedience: The Milgram Experiment
The concept of obedience to authority was rigorously examined by psychologist Stanley Milgram in the early 1960s. Milgram's research was driven by the question of how the Holocaust could have occurred and the role of obedience within it. He hypothesized that the capacity for obedience was a powerful force in social behavior, not unique to any particular culture. In his controlled laboratory experiment, participants were instructed to administer what they believed were electric shocks to a "learner" for incorrect answers. The shocks were simulated, and the learner was an actor, but the participants were unaware of this. The results were startling: a large majority of participants were willing to administer the highest shocks when prompted by an authority figure. This outcome suggested that under specific conditions, ordinary individuals could be led to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience.Ethical Reflections on Obedience Studies
The ethical implications of Milgram's experiment have been a point of contention and have influenced the development of ethical standards in psychological research. Participants in Milgram's study were subjected to a high level of stress and deception, as they were led to believe they were causing real harm to another person. The experiment also raised questions about the right to withdraw, as participants received verbal prods to continue. These ethical issues have been instrumental in shaping the ethical guidelines that govern contemporary psychological research, ensuring that participants are fully informed and able to give consent, and that their welfare is protected throughout the study.Obedience in the Modern Context: Bocchiaro et al.'s Study
In 2012, Bocchiaro and colleagues conducted a study that extended Milgram's work by examining not only obedience but also disobedience and whistleblowing. Participants were asked to predict their reactions to an unethical request and then placed in a situation where they could choose to obey, disobey, or expose the wrongdoing. Despite their predictions, the majority of participants complied with the authority's instructions, with only a minority choosing to dissent or report the unethical behavior. This study underscored the often-unexpected gap between individuals' expectations of their moral behavior and their actual actions when confronted with authority.An Ethical Reassessment of Obedience: Burger's Modified Study
Jerry Burger's 2009 study sought to replicate Milgram's findings while adhering to modern ethical standards. Burger's experiment was designed to end at the point where obedience typically plateaued in Milgram's original study, which was at 150 volts. This modification significantly reduced the potential for participant distress. Burger also ensured that participants were aware of their right to withdraw at any time and provided a thorough debriefing to mitigate any negative effects. Additionally, Burger pre-screened participants for psychological robustness and familiarity with Milgram's study, further enhancing the ethical integrity of the research.Confirming the Persistence of Obedience: Burger's Findings
The objective of Burger's replication was to confirm the robustness of Milgram's original findings while exploring the influence of personality traits on obedience. Burger hypothesized that factors such as empathy and a person's locus of control might affect their likelihood to obey authority figures. The results of his study mirrored those of Milgram, with a comparable proportion of participants demonstrating a willingness to administer shocks past the critical 150-volt juncture. This replication not only reaffirmed the original conclusions about obedience but also contributed to a more sophisticated understanding of the interplay between individual characteristics and obedience.Evolution of Obedience Research: From Milgram to the Present
A comparative analysis of obedience research from Milgram's era to contemporary times highlights significant advancements in ethical considerations and methodological sophistication. Milgram's pioneering work provided a foundation for understanding the mechanisms of obedience to authority, albeit with ethical compromises. Subsequent research, including the studies by Bocchiaro et al. and Burger, has built upon Milgram's insights while adhering to rigorous ethical standards. These modern studies have enriched our comprehension of obedience by factoring in individual differences and examining the relative influence of situational versus dispositional variables. The progression of this research reflects the ongoing commitment within social psychology to unravel the complexities of obedience and the power of authority in shaping human behavior.Want to create maps from your material?
Insert your material in few seconds you will have your Algor Card with maps, summaries, flashcards and quizzes.
Try Algor
Learn with Algor Education flashcards
Click on each Card to learn more about the topic
1
Milgram's experiment involved participants thinking they were giving ______ to a 'learner' for wrong answers, not knowing it was a ______.
Click to check the answer
2
The findings revealed that most subjects complied with authority to deliver the most severe shocks, challenging their own ______.
Click to check the answer
3
Participant stress level in Milgram's study
Click to check the answer
4
Deception in psychological experiments
Click to check the answer
5
Right to withdraw in research
Click to check the answer
6
The study revealed a surprising difference between how people thought they would respond to ______, and their real actions under authoritative pressure.
Click to check the answer
7
Burger's experiment voltage cap
Click to check the answer
8
Participant withdrawal rights in Burger's study
Click to check the answer
9
Pre-screening in Burger's replication
Click to check the answer
10
The study found a similar number of individuals willing to deliver shocks beyond the ______ mark, reinforcing the original findings on ______.
Click to check the answer
11
Ethical advancements in obedience research post-Milgram
Click to check the answer
12
Role of individual differences in modern obedience studies
Click to check the answer
13
Situational vs. dispositional factors in obedience
Click to check the answer
Q&A
Here's a list of frequently asked questions on this topic
Similar Contents
Psychology
Cyberbullying: Understanding, Prevention, and Response
View documentPsychology
Understanding Eating Disorders
View documentPsychology
Depressive Disorders and Their Treatment
View documentPsychology
Biomedical Therapies in Mental Health Care
View document