The Cognitive Interview: Enhancing Eyewitness Testimony

The Cognitive Interview (CI) is a technique developed by psychologists to improve eyewitness testimony reliability. It involves mental reconstruction, varied recall, and perspective shifts to enhance memory retrieval. The Enhanced Cognitive Interview (ECI) further addresses social dynamics for better results. Empirical studies validate CI's effectiveness in providing detailed, accurate accounts, making it a vital tool in criminal investigations.

See more
Open map in editor

Exploring the Cognitive Interview Method

The cognitive interview (CI) is an advanced interviewing technique used by law enforcement to improve the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Developed by psychologists Ronald P. Fisher and R. Edward Geiselman in the 1980s, the CI is designed to overcome the limitations of traditional questioning methods. It employs specific cognitive strategies to facilitate the retrieval of accurate memories by focusing on the psychological principles of memory encoding and retrieval. These strategies include the mental reconstruction of the crime scene, encouraging exhaustive reporting, varying the order of event recall, and considering different perspectives. The CI is based on the concept of retrieval failure, positing that the likelihood of accessing a memory increases when the context during retrieval closely matches the original context of memory formation.
Two people sitting at a wooden table during an interview in a neutral colored room, with a glass of water between them.

The Core Components of the Cognitive Interview

The cognitive interview is structured around four core components that guide the interview process. The first component, mental reinstatement of context, asks witnesses to recreate the environment and their emotional state at the time of the incident. The second, detailed reporting, encourages witnesses to provide every detail they can recall, even if it seems trivial, as this may lead to the retrieval of more significant memories. The third component involves recalling the events in different chronological orders, which can disrupt the influence of expectations or pre-existing schemas on memory recall. The fourth component, changing perspectives, involves asking the witness to describe the event from another person's viewpoint, which can provide new details and reduce the effect of the witness's own biases. These components are designed to work synergistically to maximize the accuracy and completeness of the information recalled.

Want to create maps from your material?

Insert your material in few seconds you will have your Algor Card with maps, summaries, flashcards and quizzes.

Try Algor

Learn with Algor Education flashcards

Click on each Card to learn more about the topic

1

Developed by ______ and ______ in the ______, this interview method addresses the shortcomings of conventional questioning.

Click to check the answer

Ronald P. Fisher R. Edward Geiselman 1980s

2

The CI technique is grounded in the theory of ______ failure, suggesting that memory recall improves when the ______ during retrieval is similar to the initial memory ______.

Click to check the answer

retrieval context formation

3

First Component of Cognitive Interview

Click to check the answer

Mental reinstatement of context - Witnesses recreate environment and emotional state during incident.

4

Third Component of Cognitive Interview

Click to check the answer

Recall events in different orders - Disrupts influence of expectations and schemas on memory.

5

Fourth Component of Cognitive Interview

Click to check the answer

Change perspectives - Witnesses describe event from another's viewpoint to uncover new details and reduce bias.

6

The ______ cognitive interview (ECI) enhances the original CI by considering the interview's social dynamics.

Click to check the answer

enhanced

7

The ECI, improved by ______ and ______, employs strategies like building rapport and allowing witnesses to control the conversation pace.

Click to check the answer

Fisher Geiselman

8

Key studies on CI effectiveness

Click to check the answer

Geiselman et al. (1985) and Fisher et al. (1989) foundational studies showing CI superiority over standard interviews.

9

CI impact on eyewitness information

Click to check the answer

CI increases quantity and quality of details from eyewitnesses, enhancing testimony reliability.

10

CI's role in reducing incorrect details

Click to check the answer

CI shown to decrease false information reported by eyewitnesses, improving testimony accuracy.

11

The CI technique is versatile, working well with diverse groups like ______ and the ______, and across different types of ______.

Click to check the answer

children elderly crimes

12

Time requirements of CI

Click to check the answer

CI is more time-consuming than standard interviews, requiring longer sessions.

13

CI interviewer training needs

Click to check the answer

Interviewers need specialized training for CI, which demands additional resources.

14

Ecological validity of CI studies

Click to check the answer

Some CI studies, like those by Geiselman et al., are critiqued for using simulations instead of real-life crimes.

15

Despite requiring thorough training and possibly long interviews, the ______ interview remains a vital method for gathering detailed and ______ eyewitness information.

Click to check the answer

cognitive accurate

Q&A

Here's a list of frequently asked questions on this topic

Similar Contents

Psychology

Etiology of Psychological Disorders

View document

Psychology

Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID)

View document

Psychology

Preventive Mental Health

View document

Psychology

Cyberbullying: Understanding, Prevention, and Response

View document