;
Feedback
What do you think about us?
Your name
Your email
Message
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Lopez (1995) is a landmark case that redefined the balance of power between the federal government and the states. It challenged the broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause, setting a precedent for limiting federal authority and altering the landscape of federalism. The case's implications continue to influence the legal discourse on the division of powers in the United States.
Show More
The Supreme Court has often reinforced the federal government's authority and interpreted the Constitution to allow for a broad exercise of federal powers
Legal Challenge to Gun-Free School Zones Act
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Lopez (1995) marked a new era in federal-state relations by imposing limits on federal authority
The Commerce Clause has historically been interpreted expansively, allowing Congress to legislate on a wide range of issues affecting interstate commerce
The U.S. Constitution sought to balance the powers of the federal government with the rights of the states, reflecting the ongoing debate between federalists and antifederalists
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court affirmed the federal government's implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court further extended the reach of federal legislation under the Commerce Clause
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)
In Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964), the Supreme Court continued to expand federal legislative power under the Commerce Clause
Gonzalez v. Raich (2005)
In Gonzalez v. Raich (2005), the Supreme Court upheld the federal government's authority to regulate marijuana use under the Commerce Clause
United States v. Lopez (1995) began as a legal challenge to the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which prohibited the possession of firearms in school zones
The constitutionality of the Gun-Free School Zones Act was contested on the grounds that the federal government had overstepped its powers by regulating an area traditionally under state jurisdiction
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, marking a significant limitation on federal legislative power
00
In the case ______ (1995), the Supreme Court marked a shift by restricting the extent of federal authority.
United States v. Lopez
01
Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990
Federal law banning firearms in school zones; central to United States v. Lopez case.
02
Alfonso Lopez, Jr.'s initial charges
Charged under Texas law before federal prosecution under Gun-Free School Zones Act.
