The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and the Advent of IQ
The Binet-Simon scale was revised and standardized by Lewis Terman, a psychologist at Stanford University, resulting in the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Introduced in 1916, this scale was instrumental in popularizing the intelligence quotient, or IQ, a score derived from standardized tests designed to measure human intelligence. The Stanford-Binet scale was a significant advancement in psychological assessment and became a cornerstone for intelligence testing in the United States, influencing educational practices and the field of psychology.Mass Intelligence Testing in the Military by Robert Yerkes
During World War I, psychologist Robert Yerkes led an unprecedented effort to apply intelligence testing on a massive scale within the U.S. Army. Yerkes and his colleagues developed two written tests, the Army Alpha and Beta, as well as a non-verbal evaluation for those who were illiterate or non-English speakers. These tests aimed to assess the mental abilities of over a million recruits. Yerkes believed that these tests could objectively measure innate intelligence, although his approach was later criticized for cultural and language biases.Consequences of Yerkes' Intelligence Testing on U.S. Policy
The results of Yerkes' intelligence testing had significant implications. The average score of American draftees was reported to be at a mental age of 13, a finding Yerkes used to argue for the heritability of intelligence. The tests also ranked individuals based on their country of origin, which contributed to a hierarchy of ethnic groups that was used to justify restrictive immigration policies. The Immigration Restriction Act of 1924 was influenced by these findings, which had profound effects on the composition of American society and had tragic implications during the Holocaust, as it limited the number of immigrants from certain regions.Stephen Jay Gould's Examination of Yerkes' Testing Methods
In his 1981 book "The Mismeasure of Man," Stephen Jay Gould critically examined the methodology of Yerkes' intelligence testing. Gould's analysis revealed significant biases and methodological flaws, such as the cultural specificity of test items and the problematic conditions under which the tests were administered. He argued that these tests did not accurately measure innate intelligence and that the results were misused to support discriminatory policies. Gould's work underscored the need for critical scrutiny of intelligence testing practices.The Continuing Debate Over Intelligence Testing
The history of intelligence testing is a complex tapestry of scientific innovation and societal impact. From Galton's initial theories to Binet's developmental approach and Yerkes' large-scale application, the quest to measure intelligence has evolved significantly. However, the field has also faced ongoing challenges related to cultural bias and the ethical use of test results. The scrutiny of past practices, such as Gould's critique, highlights the importance of ensuring that intelligence tests are used responsibly and that their limitations are understood in the context of assessing human abilities.