Feedback
What do you think about us?
Your name
Your email
Message
Reicher and Haslam's 2006 study delves into the psychological foundations of tyranny, examining how power imbalances affect behavior in a simulated prison. Ethical considerations were paramount, with a focus on role assignment and social identity. The experiment revealed the impact of role permeability and fixed roles on group dynamics and the potential for hierarchical collapse and reconstruction.
Show More
Reicher and Haslam's study aimed to examine the emergence and maintenance of tyrannical dynamics in groups
Selection Process
The study involved rigorous screening and selection of 15 male participants to simulate a prison environment
Experimental Design
The study included daily psychological assessments and physiological monitoring to gauge stress and social identity
The study revealed the pivotal role of social identity in the sustenance of group norms and the potential for tyranny to evolve from group dynamics
The concept of role fluidity was introduced in the experiment, influencing participants' behaviors and attitudes
When roles became fixed, the 'prisoners' developed a robust collective identity, while the 'guards' grew increasingly uneasy with their roles
The study observed that the presence of role mobility diminished strong social identification, while fixed roles led to a robust collective identity
The study revealed that in the absence of a functional social order, individuals are more receptive to alternative systems, indicating the potential for tyranny to evolve from group dynamics
Reicher and Haslam's study prioritized ethical standards and sought to rectify the shortcomings of previous experiments
The study is not without limitations, such as the potential for demand characteristics and the small, exclusively male sample size