Feedback
What do you think about us?
Your name
Your email
Message
Piliavin's Subway Experiment, conducted in 1969, delves into the factors influencing bystander intervention in emergencies. It examines the role of victim characteristics and the presence of others on helping behavior. Key findings reveal that people are more likely to assist those perceived as ill over intoxicated individuals, and that intervention likelihood increases once someone takes the initiative to help. The study's implications challenge previous notions of the bystander effect and highlight the emotional and cognitive processes involved in deciding to help.
Show More
The murder of Kitty Genovese in 1964 sparked public concern about apathetic societal behavior
The presence of other witnesses reduces the likelihood of individual intervention in an emergency
Each observer feels less compelled to act when others are present
The study aimed to explore how victim's condition and race influenced bystander intervention
The researchers examined the impact of a model helper's presence on bystander intervention
The researchers implemented controls to ensure the reliability of their findings, such as consistent 'victims' and a controlled setting
Victims perceived as sick received more help than those perceived as intoxicated
Men were more likely to provide help and same-race helping behavior was more prevalent in the 'drunk' condition
The experiment demonstrated the role of social influence in promoting helping behavior
The study's outcomes challenged the conventional understanding of the bystander effect and diffusion of responsibility
The researchers suggested that bystanders experience emotional arousal and engage in a cost-reward analysis when deciding to intervene
The study's strengths included its ecological validity and substantial sample size, but it also faced limitations such as controlling extraneous variables and ethical concerns