Eyewitness psychology examines the reliability of eyewitness testimony in legal settings, focusing on memory formation, preservation, and retrieval. It addresses the influence of stress, environmental factors, and cognitive biases on memory accuracy. Strategies like cognitive interviews and fair line-up procedures are discussed to improve the precision of eyewitness accounts, which are crucial in criminal justice.
Show More
Memories can be influenced by various factors, such as stress and leading questions
External Factors
Conditions of the event, post-event information, and cognitive mechanisms can impact the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
Internal Factors
Cognitive processes like memory encoding, storage, and retrieval can affect the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
Techniques such as the cognitive interview and fair line-up procedures can improve the reliability of eyewitness testimony
Eyewitnesses play a crucial role in providing direct observations that can support or refute evidence in criminal cases
Inherent Imperfections of Human Memory
Factors such as memory distortion and the unreliable correlation between confidence and accuracy can lead to errors in eyewitness testimony
Potential Consequences of Inaccurate Testimony
Inaccurate eyewitness testimony can have serious implications, including the conviction of innocent individuals or the exoneration of the guilty
Cognitive processes such as perception, attention, and memory encoding play a role in how eyewitnesses remember and recall events
Biases such as confirmation bias and the misinformation effect can distort eyewitness recollections, leading to inaccuracies
Understanding cognitive processes and biases can help legal practitioners better comprehend and address the complexities of eyewitness testimony