Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) is a landmark Supreme Court case that established the constitutional right to privacy, particularly in marital intimacy and contraceptive use. It challenged a Connecticut law, leading to a decision that shaped privacy rights and influenced cases like Roe v. Wade. The case's legacy continues to affect debates on privacy and reproductive rights, highlighting the dynamic interpretation of constitutional rights.
Show More
The Griswold v. Connecticut case took place during a time of significant social change, including evolving attitudes towards birth control and reproductive rights
Challenging the Restrictive Law
Griswold and Buxton sought to challenge the stringent anti-contraceptive statute in Connecticut
Justice Douglas' concept of "penumbras" played a crucial role in the Supreme Court's decision
The case centered around the right to marital privacy and the extent of state authority
Unlawful Invasion of Privacy
Griswold and Buxton argued that the Connecticut statute infringed upon the privacy of married couples
Excessive Government Interference
They also argued that physicians should be able to provide medical counsel without excessive government interference
The State of Connecticut justified the statute as a means to uphold public morals
The Griswold v. Connecticut decision established a constitutional basis for the right to privacy, influencing numerous landmark cases and advancing gender equality
Digital Privacy
The case continues to be referenced in discussions about digital privacy and the protection of personal data
Reproductive Rights
Griswold's legacy endures in the context of reproductive rights, as seen in the contraceptive coverage mandates in the Affordable Care Act
The case's lasting influence on American legal thought and the ongoing debate over the balance between individual liberties and state powers remains contentious