The Alternative Vote System
The Alternative Vote (AV) system, also known as preferential voting, aims to overcome vote splitting and promote majority support in elections. Voters rank candidates by preference, with a redistribution of votes until one candidate achieves a majority. This system encourages moderate campaigning and reduces wasted votes. While offering a more democratic outcome, AV faces criticisms for potential complexity and disproportionate results. It's used in Australian elections and was rejected in the UK's 2011 referendum.
See moreExploring the Alternative Vote (AV) Electoral System
The Alternative Vote (AV) system, also known as preferential voting or instant runoff voting, is designed to address certain shortcomings of the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) electoral system, particularly the problem of vote-splitting among similar candidates. In AV, voters rank the candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives an absolute majority of first-preference votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed according to the second preferences indicated on those ballots. This process of elimination and redistribution continues until one candidate secures more than half of the votes and is declared the winner.The Redistribution Mechanism in the Alternative Vote System
To understand the AV counting process, consider an election with candidates A, B, and C. If the initial count reveals no majority winner, the candidate with the least votes, for example, candidate A, is eliminated. The votes for candidate A are then reassigned to the remaining candidates based on the second preferences marked by A's supporters. If a significant number of A's voters had selected B as their second choice, B would gain these votes. This process of redistributing votes from the least popular candidates continues until one candidate achieves a majority, ensuring the elected candidate has a broad base of support.Vote Splitting and the First-Past-The-Post System
The FPTP system, employed in various countries including the United Kingdom, declares the candidate with the plurality of votes the winner, even without an absolute majority. This can result in vote splitting, where multiple candidates with similar platforms divide the support base, potentially enabling a candidate with a distinct platform to win with less than majority support. The AV system seeks to rectify this by allowing voters to rank multiple candidates, thereby reducing the impact of vote splitting on the final election outcome.Campaign Dynamics under the Alternative Vote System
The AV system promotes a less adversarial style of campaigning, as candidates must seek not only the first-preference votes but also the subsequent preferences of voters whose first choices are other candidates. This requirement for a broader appeal can lead to more inclusive and less negative campaigning. Studies indicate that the AV system tends to disadvantage candidates with extreme or polarizing positions, as they are less likely to receive the necessary second or third-preference votes to survive the elimination rounds.Benefits of the Alternative Vote System
The AV system offers numerous advantages. It encourages candidates to engage with a wider electorate and generally favors those with moderate views over extremists. Negative campaigning is less effective, and voters can confidently vote for their preferred candidate without the fear of "wasting" their vote, as their subsequent preferences will come into play if their top choice is eliminated. Moreover, the AV system helps to ensure that the elected candidate is one that a majority of voters can support, which advocates argue enhances the democratic nature of elections.Criticisms of the Alternative Vote System
However, the AV system is not without its criticisms. It is not a proportional representation system and can sometimes produce results that are more disproportionate than those under FPTP. The complexity of the system may discourage some voters from participating, and there is a risk of "donkey voting," where voters rank candidates in the order they appear on the ballot without consideration. The AV system can also lead to the election of a "compromise" candidate who is not the most favored but the least objectionable. Furthermore, the counting process is more labor-intensive and time-consuming, and the transition to AV-compatible voting technology can incur significant costs.The Alternative Vote in Australian Elections
Australia serves as a key example of the AV system in practice, having implemented it in 1918 to prevent vote-splitting among conservative candidates. The system is utilized in both federal and state elections, with some states mandating full preferential voting (FPV), where voters must rank all candidates, and others permitting optional preferential voting (OPV), where voters can rank as many or as few candidates as they wish. The use of preferential voting has reduced the dominance of a two-party system and has allowed minor parties to exert greater influence in Australian politics.The Alternative Vote Referendum in the United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, the AV system was the subject of a 2011 referendum following the coalition government formed between the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats after the 2010 general election. Although the Conservatives had historically been resistant to electoral reform, they consented to the referendum as part of the coalition agreement. The proposition to adopt the AV system for elections to the House of Commons was decisively rejected by approximately 68% of voters. Nonetheless, the AV system is employed by the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats for the selection of their party leaders.Want to create maps from your material?
Insert your material in few seconds you will have your Algor Card with maps, summaries, flashcards and quizzes.
Try Algor
Learn with Algor Education flashcards
Click on each Card to learn more about the topic
1
AV system also known as?
Click to check the answer
2
AV system initial vote requirement for win?
Click to check the answer
3
AV system process if no initial majority?
Click to check the answer
4
In the AV counting method, if no candidate wins a ______, the one with the fewest votes is ______.
Click to check the answer
5
FPTP system definition
Click to check the answer
6
AV system purpose
Click to check the answer
7
Vote splitting explained
Click to check the answer
8
Research suggests that the ______ system may not favor candidates with ______ or polarizing views, due to their lower chances of receiving additional preference votes.
Click to check the answer
9
AV system impact on candidate engagement
Click to check the answer
10
AV system effect on campaign strategies
Click to check the answer
11
AV system and voter confidence
Click to check the answer
12
The AV system may lead to the election of a candidate who is not the most ______, but rather the least ______.
Click to check the answer
13
Critics argue that the AV system's counting process is more ______-intensive and ______ than simpler methods.
Click to check the answer
14
AV system implementation year in Australia
Click to check the answer
15
FPV vs OPV in Australian elections
Click to check the answer
16
AV system effect on party dominance in Australia
Click to check the answer
17
Despite the 2011 national rejection, the ______ and the ______ use the AV system to choose their party leaders.
Click to check the answer