Logo
Logo
Log inSign up
Logo

Tools

AI Concept MapsAI Mind MapsAI Study NotesAI FlashcardsAI Quizzes

Resources

BlogTemplate

Info

PricingFAQTeam

info@algoreducation.com

Corso Castelfidardo 30A, Torino (TO), Italy

Algor Lab S.r.l. - Startup Innovativa - P.IVA IT12537010014

Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyTerms and Conditions

The Alternative Vote System

The Alternative Vote (AV) system, also known as preferential voting, aims to overcome vote splitting and promote majority support in elections. Voters rank candidates by preference, with a redistribution of votes until one candidate achieves a majority. This system encourages moderate campaigning and reduces wasted votes. While offering a more democratic outcome, AV faces criticisms for potential complexity and disproportionate results. It's used in Australian elections and was rejected in the UK's 2011 referendum.

See more
Open map in editor

1

4

Open map in editor

Want to create maps from your material?

Insert your material in few seconds you will have your Algor Card with maps, summaries, flashcards and quizzes.

Try Algor

Learn with Algor Education flashcards

Click on each Card to learn more about the topic

1

AV system also known as?

Click to check the answer

Preferential voting, instant runoff voting.

2

AV system initial vote requirement for win?

Click to check the answer

Absolute majority of first-preference votes.

3

AV system process if no initial majority?

Click to check the answer

Eliminate lowest candidate, redistribute votes based on next preference.

4

In the AV counting method, if no candidate wins a ______, the one with the fewest votes is ______.

Click to check the answer

majority eliminated

5

FPTP system definition

Click to check the answer

FPTP stands for First-Past-The-Post, a voting method where the candidate with the most votes wins.

6

AV system purpose

Click to check the answer

The Alternative Vote system allows voters to rank candidates to mitigate vote splitting and ensure majority support.

7

Vote splitting explained

Click to check the answer

Vote splitting occurs when similar candidates divide the vote, which can lead to a less popular candidate winning.

8

Research suggests that the ______ system may not favor candidates with ______ or polarizing views, due to their lower chances of receiving additional preference votes.

Click to check the answer

AV extreme

9

AV system impact on candidate engagement

Click to check the answer

Encourages engagement with broader electorate, promoting outreach beyond core supporters.

10

AV system effect on campaign strategies

Click to check the answer

Reduces effectiveness of negative campaigning, incentivizing positive, policy-focused strategies.

11

AV system and voter confidence

Click to check the answer

Allows voters to back preferred candidate without fear of vote waste; preferences count if top choice eliminated.

12

The AV system may lead to the election of a candidate who is not the most ______, but rather the least ______.

Click to check the answer

favored objectionable

13

Critics argue that the AV system's counting process is more ______-intensive and ______ than simpler methods.

Click to check the answer

labor time-consuming

14

AV system implementation year in Australia

Click to check the answer

1918

15

FPV vs OPV in Australian elections

Click to check the answer

FPV requires ranking all candidates, OPV allows ranking as many or few as wished

16

AV system effect on party dominance in Australia

Click to check the answer

Reduced two-party dominance, increased minor parties' influence

17

Despite the 2011 national rejection, the ______ and the ______ use the AV system to choose their party leaders.

Click to check the answer

Labour Party Liberal Democrats

Q&A

Here's a list of frequently asked questions on this topic

Similar Contents

Civic Education

The Electoral College and its Role in the US Presidential Election System

View document

Civic Education

The Role of Incumbency in American Electoral Politics

View document

Civic Education

Political Parties in the United States

View document

Civic Education

The Libertarian Party: Advocating for Individual Rights and Limited Government

View document

Exploring the Alternative Vote (AV) Electoral System

The Alternative Vote (AV) system, also known as preferential voting or instant runoff voting, is designed to address certain shortcomings of the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) electoral system, particularly the problem of vote-splitting among similar candidates. In AV, voters rank the candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives an absolute majority of first-preference votes, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed according to the second preferences indicated on those ballots. This process of elimination and redistribution continues until one candidate secures more than half of the votes and is declared the winner.
Diverse hands holding colorful pens over blank voting ballots, symbolizing democratic participation in a softly lit room.

The Redistribution Mechanism in the Alternative Vote System

To understand the AV counting process, consider an election with candidates A, B, and C. If the initial count reveals no majority winner, the candidate with the least votes, for example, candidate A, is eliminated. The votes for candidate A are then reassigned to the remaining candidates based on the second preferences marked by A's supporters. If a significant number of A's voters had selected B as their second choice, B would gain these votes. This process of redistributing votes from the least popular candidates continues until one candidate achieves a majority, ensuring the elected candidate has a broad base of support.

Vote Splitting and the First-Past-The-Post System

The FPTP system, employed in various countries including the United Kingdom, declares the candidate with the plurality of votes the winner, even without an absolute majority. This can result in vote splitting, where multiple candidates with similar platforms divide the support base, potentially enabling a candidate with a distinct platform to win with less than majority support. The AV system seeks to rectify this by allowing voters to rank multiple candidates, thereby reducing the impact of vote splitting on the final election outcome.

Campaign Dynamics under the Alternative Vote System

The AV system promotes a less adversarial style of campaigning, as candidates must seek not only the first-preference votes but also the subsequent preferences of voters whose first choices are other candidates. This requirement for a broader appeal can lead to more inclusive and less negative campaigning. Studies indicate that the AV system tends to disadvantage candidates with extreme or polarizing positions, as they are less likely to receive the necessary second or third-preference votes to survive the elimination rounds.

Benefits of the Alternative Vote System

The AV system offers numerous advantages. It encourages candidates to engage with a wider electorate and generally favors those with moderate views over extremists. Negative campaigning is less effective, and voters can confidently vote for their preferred candidate without the fear of "wasting" their vote, as their subsequent preferences will come into play if their top choice is eliminated. Moreover, the AV system helps to ensure that the elected candidate is one that a majority of voters can support, which advocates argue enhances the democratic nature of elections.

Criticisms of the Alternative Vote System

However, the AV system is not without its criticisms. It is not a proportional representation system and can sometimes produce results that are more disproportionate than those under FPTP. The complexity of the system may discourage some voters from participating, and there is a risk of "donkey voting," where voters rank candidates in the order they appear on the ballot without consideration. The AV system can also lead to the election of a "compromise" candidate who is not the most favored but the least objectionable. Furthermore, the counting process is more labor-intensive and time-consuming, and the transition to AV-compatible voting technology can incur significant costs.

The Alternative Vote in Australian Elections

Australia serves as a key example of the AV system in practice, having implemented it in 1918 to prevent vote-splitting among conservative candidates. The system is utilized in both federal and state elections, with some states mandating full preferential voting (FPV), where voters must rank all candidates, and others permitting optional preferential voting (OPV), where voters can rank as many or as few candidates as they wish. The use of preferential voting has reduced the dominance of a two-party system and has allowed minor parties to exert greater influence in Australian politics.

The Alternative Vote Referendum in the United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, the AV system was the subject of a 2011 referendum following the coalition government formed between the Conservative Party and the Liberal Democrats after the 2010 general election. Although the Conservatives had historically been resistant to electoral reform, they consented to the referendum as part of the coalition agreement. The proposition to adopt the AV system for elections to the House of Commons was decisively rejected by approximately 68% of voters. Nonetheless, the AV system is employed by the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats for the selection of their party leaders.