Logo
Logo
Log inSign up
Logo

Tools

AI Concept MapsAI Mind MapsAI Study NotesAI FlashcardsAI Quizzes

Resources

BlogTemplate

Info

PricingFAQTeam

info@algoreducation.com

Corso Castelfidardo 30A, Torino (TO), Italy

Algor Lab S.r.l. - Startup Innovativa - P.IVA IT12537010014

Privacy PolicyCookie PolicyTerms and Conditions

The Obedience Experiment of Stanley Milgram

Stanley Milgram's obedience experiment, conducted in the 1960s, sought to understand human compliance with authority figures. It revealed that ordinary people could obey orders to inflict pain on others, with 65% of participants delivering the maximum shocks. The study sparked ethical debates and influenced psychological research guidelines.

See more
Open map in editor

1

5

Open map in editor

Want to create maps from your material?

Insert your material in few seconds you will have your Algor Card with maps, summaries, flashcards and quizzes.

Try Algor

Learn with Algor Education flashcards

Click on each Card to learn more about the topic

1

In ______, Milgram began a study to explore if obedience to authority was a ______ human trait.

Click to check the answer

1961 universal

2

Milgram Experiment Participants

Click to check the answer

40 male volunteers from diverse jobs and educational levels, recruited via newspaper ads.

3

Milgram Experiment Roles

Click to check the answer

Participants assigned 'teacher' role; 'learner' was an actor, part of the setup.

4

Milgram Experiment Procedure

Click to check the answer

Teachers instructed to administer escalating shocks for learner's incorrect answers; shocks were fake.

5

In the study, the 'teacher' had to give shocks with ______ for each error made by the 'learner', ranging from ______ to ______ volts.

Click to check the answer

increasing voltage 15 450

6

When the 'teacher' hesitated to deliver shocks, the experimenter, wearing a ______, would urge them to proceed using standardized ______.

Click to check the answer

lab coat prods

7

Participant's emotional response in Milgram's study

Click to check the answer

Signs of extreme tension: sweating, trembling, nervous laughter.

8

Milgram's interpretation of obedience

Click to check the answer

Obedience to authority is deeply ingrained, can lead to ethically questionable actions.

9

Role of coercion in Milgram's experiment

Click to check the answer

No direct coercion; obedience was due to the authority figure's perceived power.

10

Milgram's experiment was groundbreaking in measuring ______ within a controlled setting, allowing for future ______.

Click to check the answer

obedience replication

11

The study's ______ validity was doubted because the lab environment might not mirror ______ scenarios accurately.

Click to check the answer

external real-world

12

Nature of deception in Milgram's study

Click to check the answer

Participants misled about study's true purpose and the fake shocks.

13

Participants' emotional stress in Milgram's study

Click to check the answer

Subjects experienced significant stress believing they were harming others.

14

Post-Milgram ethical research guidelines

Click to check the answer

Stricter rules established, stressing informed consent and right to withdraw.

15

The experiment led to important conversations on ______ research practices and the impact of ______ on human behavior.

Click to check the answer

ethical authority

Q&A

Here's a list of frequently asked questions on this topic

Similar Contents

Psychology

Nicotine Dependence

View document

Psychology

Electroencephalograms (EEGs) and Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)

View document

Psychology

Understanding Addiction

View document

Psychology

The Human Brain: A Complex Organ

View document

Origins of Milgram's Obedience Experiment

The origins of Stanley Milgram's obedience experiment can be traced back to the post-World War II period, particularly the trial of Adolf Eichmann, an SS officer who defended his actions by claiming he was simply following orders. Milgram, a psychologist, was driven by the question of whether this defense indicated a common human tendency to obey authority figures, even to the point of committing atrocities. In 1961, he devised an experiment to investigate the limits of obedience to authority and to determine if this was a characteristic unique to the German people or a more universal human behavior.
Laboratory with vintage electric shock generator for Milgram experiment, hand over gradient switches, chair with straps in blurred background.

Objectives and Design of Milgram's Experiment

The primary objective of Milgram's experiment was to examine the extent to which individuals would comply with an authority figure's instructions to perform actions that conflicted with their personal conscience. The study involved forty male participants from diverse backgrounds, who were recruited through newspaper ads and believed they were participating in a study on learning and memory at Yale University. They were assigned the role of 'teacher' and were instructed to administer increasingly severe electric shocks to a 'learner' for each incorrect response in a memory task. Unbeknownst to the participants, the shocks were simulated, and the 'learner' was an actor, part of the experimental setup.

Conducting the Obedience Experiment

In the experiment, the 'teacher' was situated in a separate room from the 'learner' and was instructed to administer shocks of increasing voltage for each mistake, with the shock levels marked from 15 to 450 volts. The 'teachers' were given a sample shock to reinforce the illusion of the shocks' authenticity. As the 'learner' began to express discomfort and eventually fell silent, the experimenter, dressed in a lab coat to emphasize authority, would prompt the 'teacher' to continue with a series of standardized prods whenever they showed reluctance to administer shocks.

Findings and Consequences of Milgram's Research

The results of Milgram's experiment were startling: every participant administered shocks up to 300 volts, and about 65% continued to the maximum voltage of 450 volts, despite the apparent distress of the 'learner.' The participants showed signs of extreme tension, such as sweating, trembling, and nervous laughter, highlighting the powerful influence of the authority figure. Milgram's conclusion was that ordinary people are capable of obeying orders to perform ethically questionable actions, even without any direct coercion, indicating that obedience to authority is a deeply ingrained behavior in humans.

Evaluation of the Obedience Experiment

Milgram's experiment was innovative in quantifying obedience and provided a controlled environment that ensured high internal validity and the possibility of replication. However, the study's external validity was questioned, as critics argued that the laboratory setting might not accurately represent real-world situations. The homogeneity of the participant sample, consisting only of males, also raised concerns about the generalizability of the results to a broader population, including women and people from different cultural backgrounds.

Ethical Considerations in Milgram's Study

The ethical aspects of Milgram's obedience experiment have been widely debated. The experiment involved deception, as participants were misled about the nature of the study and the shocks being administered. The resulting emotional stress experienced by participants raised ethical concerns, despite the debriefing process that followed the experiment. The study's ethical issues contributed to the development of more stringent ethical guidelines for the conduct of psychological research, emphasizing the importance of informed consent and the right to withdraw without penalty.

Milgram's Experiment in Educational Contexts

Milgram's obedience experiment has become a fundamental part of social psychology education, shedding light on the complex nature of authority and obedience. The experiment's findings underscore the tendency of individuals to obey authority figures, even when it conflicts with their moral values. Despite ongoing debates about its methodology and ethics, the experiment has had a profound influence on the field of psychology, prompting critical discussions about ethical research practices and enhancing our understanding of human behavior in the context of authority.