Exploring the dynamics of obedience in psychology, this content delves into the Milgram experiment and its revelations about human behavior under authority. It also examines the ethical concerns raised by the study, subsequent research by Bocchiaro et al. on disobedience, and Burger's ethical replication of Milgram's work. The evolution of obedience research reflects changes in ethical standards and psychological understanding.
Show More
The Milgram experiment sought to understand the willingness of individuals to obey authority figures, inspired by the atrocities of the Holocaust and the Nuremberg trials
Electric Shocks and Learner
Participants were instructed to administer electric shocks to a "learner" for incorrect responses, unaware that the learner was an actor and no real shocks were given
Results and Implications
The study revealed a high proportion of participants were willing to administer potentially lethal shocks when prompted by an authoritative experimenter, challenging the idea that only certain individuals are capable of committing acts of cruelty
Informed Consent and Deception
Participants were misled about the true purpose of the experiment, raising concerns about informed consent
Emotional Distress and Right to Withdraw
Many participants experienced emotional distress and had difficulty withdrawing from the study, highlighting the importance of ethical guidelines in psychological research
The Bocchiaro study examined obedience, disobedience, and whistleblowing in the context of an unethical request in a sensory deprivation study
Despite predicting disobedience or whistleblowing, the majority of participants complied with the unethical request, revealing a significant gap between anticipated and actual behavior in the presence of perceived authority
The use of a student sample may limit the generalizability of the study's findings
Burger's study sought to replicate Milgram's findings while adhering to modern ethical standards, including stopping the administration of shocks at 150 volts and explicitly informing participants of their right to withdraw
The study found that dispositional factors, such as empathy and locus of control, did not significantly influence obedience to authority
Burger's study supports Milgram's original conclusions, showing that the tendency to obey authority persists even with ethical constraints and a modern sample
The progression of obedience research from Milgram's era to contemporary times highlights the development of ethical standards and methodological sophistication
Both classic and contemporary studies provide valuable insights into the nature of obedience, with newer research refining and extending the knowledge base established by earlier experiments