Feedback
What do you think about us?
Your name
Your email
Message
The Nullification Crisis of 1832-1833 was a pivotal standoff between South Carolina and the federal government over protective tariffs and states' rights. It highlighted the tensions between Northern industrial and Southern agricultural interests, with South Carolina deeming federal tariffs unconstitutional. Key figures included President Andrew Jackson, Vice President John C. Calhoun, and Henry Clay, who played a significant role in the Compromise Tariff. The crisis foreshadowed the Civil War and tested the balance of state sovereignty and federal authority.
Show More
The protective tariffs enacted by the federal government were a major source of conflict between the North and South
Tariff of Abominations
The Tariff of 1828, also known as the "Tariff of Abominations," significantly increased duties on imported goods, causing outrage in the South
The growing tensions between the North and South, fueled by fears of federal interference in slavery, contributed to the crisis
South Carolina's adoption of the Ordinance of Nullification in November 1832 declared the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and void within the state
The doctrine of nullification, which asserted states' rights to reject federal laws, sparked a constitutional debate over the balance of power between the states and federal government
The debate over nullification pitted advocates of states' rights against defenders of national sovereignty, with figures like Daniel Webster arguing for the indissolubility of the Union
In response to South Carolina's defiance, President Jackson issued a proclamation rejecting nullification and threatening the use of force against any state that resisted federal law
In March 1833, Congress passed the Force Bill, authorizing the use of military power to enforce federal tariffs, and the Compromise Tariff, which gradually reduced tariff rates
South Carolina's repeal of the nullification ordinance, while nullifying the Force Bill, marked the resolution of the crisis and maintained federal supremacy while easing economic tensions