The Principle of Double Jeopardy in the United States
Concept Map
The principle of double jeopardy prevents multiple prosecutions for the same crime in U.S. law. It attaches under certain conditions and has exceptions, such as the separate sovereigns doctrine. Landmark cases like Fong Foo v. United States and Gamble v. United States have shaped its interpretation, highlighting its complexity and significance in protecting citizens' rights.
Summary
Outline
The Principle of Double Jeopardy in U.S. Law
The principle of double jeopardy is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which safeguards individuals from being prosecuted more than once for the same offense. This legal doctrine ensures that once a person has been acquitted or convicted in a court of law, or has served the sentence for their crime, they cannot be subjected to another prosecution for the same incident. The clause explicitly states, "No person shall ... be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb," thereby preventing the government from retrying an individual following an acquittal, even if new evidence comes to light, and from imposing additional punishments after the original sentence has been served.The Parameters of Double Jeopardy
Double jeopardy attaches under specific conditions: in a jury trial, it attaches when the jury is empaneled and sworn; in a bench trial, it attaches when the first witness is sworn in. The attachment of jeopardy upon entering a guilty plea varies by jurisdiction. There are circumstances under which double jeopardy does not prohibit a retrial, such as when a mistrial is declared because the jury cannot reach a verdict, or other procedural issues arise that prevent the trial's completion. However, if a mistrial is due to prosecutorial misconduct or the prosecution's lack of preparation for foreseeable problems, a retrial may be precluded to prevent abuse of the legal process.Expansion of Double Jeopardy Protections
The Double Jeopardy Clause originally applied only to the federal government, but the Fourteenth Amendment has since incorporated it to apply to the states as well. This extension has come to include certain civil penalties that are considered punitive in nature. States have the authority to enact their own double jeopardy statutes, leading to variations in application across different jurisdictions. The clause's reach into civil and administrative law is complex; for example, a person acquitted of criminal charges may still face civil lawsuits or administrative penalties, such as the loss of a professional license.Exceptions to Double Jeopardy Protections
There are established exceptions to the Double Jeopardy Clause. The separate sovereigns doctrine permits both state and federal prosecutions for the same conduct if it violates the laws of each sovereign. This was affirmed in the Supreme Court case of Gamble v. United States. Additionally, if a conviction on a lesser included offense is overturned on appeal, the defendant cannot be retried for a greater offense based on the same facts. Furthermore, double jeopardy does not prevent civil or administrative actions following a criminal trial, as evidenced by the civil judgment against O.J. Simpson after his criminal acquittal.Landmark Double Jeopardy Cases
Key legal cases have defined the contours of double jeopardy. The Supreme Court's decision in Fong Foo v. United States established that an acquittal cannot be overturned even if it results from a judge's error, underscoring the finality of acquittals. In contrast, the case of Michael Weir illustrates an exception where new DNA evidence warranted a retrial, leading to a conviction and reflecting the dynamic interplay between evolving legal standards and technological advancements. These cases highlight the intricacies of double jeopardy and its essential role in maintaining the integrity of the criminal justice system.Concluding Insights on Double Jeopardy
The Double Jeopardy Clause is a fundamental aspect of the American judicial system, offering vital protection against multiple prosecutions for the same crime. Its application, while rooted in a clear principle, involves a complex array of exceptions and judicial interpretations that have developed over time. A thorough understanding of these nuances is imperative for a comprehensive grasp of how double jeopardy functions within the larger framework of U.S. criminal justice and the protections it affords to citizens.
Show More
The Fifth Amendment and Double Jeopardy
Definition of Double Jeopardy
The legal doctrine that prevents individuals from being prosecuted more than once for the same offense
Conditions for Double Jeopardy to Attach
Jury Trial
Double jeopardy attaches when the jury is empaneled and sworn
Bench Trial
Double jeopardy attaches when the first witness is sworn in
Exceptions to Double Jeopardy
Mistrials, prosecutorial misconduct, and lack of preparation may allow for retrial
Incorporation of Double Jeopardy to the States
Extension of Double Jeopardy to the States
The Fourteenth Amendment has incorporated the Double Jeopardy Clause to apply to the states
Variations in Application Across Jurisdictions
States have the authority to enact their own double jeopardy statutes, leading to variations in application
Reach of Double Jeopardy into Civil and Administrative Law
Double jeopardy may not prevent civil or administrative actions following a criminal trial
Exceptions to the Double Jeopardy Clause
Separate Sovereigns Doctrine
Both state and federal prosecutions may occur for the same conduct if it violates the laws of each sovereign
Lesser Included Offense
If a conviction on a lesser included offense is overturned on appeal, the defendant cannot be retried for a greater offense based on the same facts
Civil and Administrative Actions
Double jeopardy does not prevent civil or administrative actions following a criminal trial
Key Legal Cases and Interpretations of Double Jeopardy
Fong Foo v. United States
The Supreme Court's decision in this case established that an acquittal cannot be overturned, even if it results from a judge's error
Michael Weir
This case illustrates an exception where new DNA evidence warranted a retrial, leading to a conviction and reflecting the dynamic interplay between evolving legal standards and technological advancements
The Principle of Double Jeopardy in the United States
Learn with Algor Education flashcards
Click on each card to learn more about the topic
00
Constitutional Amendment protecting double jeopardy
Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
01
Double jeopardy protection after acquittal
No retrial allowed following an acquittal, even with new evidence
02
Double jeopardy and additional punishments
Prohibits imposing extra punishments post original sentence
